Ferguson v. City of New York

279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3167

Opinion

In our opinion the evidence adduced was sufficient to establish, prima facie, a willful and intentional killing, and a presumption arose therefrom that it was committed without justification or just cause. The proof was sufficient, in the absence of evidence on the part of the defendants to meet this presumption, to satisfy the burden of proof imposed on the plaintiff and to overcome any presumption which might otherwise have arisen that the officer acted lawfully. (Cf. People v. Sandgren, 302 N. Y. 331; People v. McCarthy, 110 N. Y. 309, and Cassidy v. Cady, 49 Misc. 478.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 665.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. City of New York, 279 A.D. 606, 107 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

279 A.D. 606 (Ferguson v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . McCarthy
18 N.E. 128 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Cassidy v. Cady
49 Misc. 478 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
People v. Sandgren
98 N.E.2d 460 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)