Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co.

66 Ill. App. 154, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 893

DecidedJune 1, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 66 Ill. App. 154 (Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. Chas. F. Adams Mfg. Co., 66 Ill. App. 154, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 893 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion per Curiam.

Appellant has filed what purports to be an abstract of the record. It amounts to nothing more than a mere index to the record. Eule 20 of this court requires the appellant to furnish a complete abstract of the record in which shall appear the evidence in narrative form.

There is hot one word of evidence in what purports to be the abstract here. The motion which appellee makes to affirm judgment for want of sufficient abstract must prevail.

The judgment will be affirmed and judgment for the costs of this court rendered against the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion per Curiam.

Appellant has filed what purports to be an abstract of the record. It amounts to nothing more than a mere index to the record. Eule 20 of this court requires the appellant to furnish a complete abstract of the record in which shall appear the evidence in narrative form.

There is hot one word of evidence in what purports to be the abstract here. The motion which appellee makes to affirm judgment for want of sufficient abstract must prevail.

The judgment will be affirmed and judgment for the costs of this court rendered against the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 Ill. App. 154, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-chas-f-adams-mfg-co-illappct-1896.