Ferguson v. Carter

520 So. 2d 706, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 584, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1988 WL 16018
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 1988·No. No. 87-1428·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

The trial court clerk’s progress docket in this case indicates that during the year preceding the motion and order of dismissal for failure to prosecute, the clerk issued a subpoena for production of documents under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.351. This is sufficient record activity to preclude dismissal under Rule 1.420(e). Cf. Biscayne Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 388 So.2d 329 (Fla.3d DCA 1980) (clerk’s docket indicating issuance of a pluries summons is sufficient record activity to defeat a motion to dismiss under Rule 1.420(e)). The order of dismissal is reversed and this case is remanded with instructions to reinstate.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Carter, 520 So. 2d 706, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 584, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 735, 1988 WL 16018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

520 So. 2d 706 (Ferguson v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony v. Schmitt
557 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)