Ferguson v. Carter

40 Ala. 607
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BYRD, J.

1. The demurrer to the original complaint was properly sustained. — Russell v. Desplous, 25 Ala. 514; S. C., 29 Ala. 308.

2. Under the liberal system of pleading authorized by the Code, we hold that the amended complaint is sufficient. The premises are described with legal certainty; the possession of complainants is alleged with sufficient accuracy; and the forcible entry and detainer by the defendant, though alleged in general terms, is allowable under the provisions of the Code; and the court, therefore, should not have sustained the demurrer thereto.

3. Without deciding whether the statute of limitations is applicable to this case, we are satisfied that it is a matter of defense, of which the defendant in the court below can only avail himself by plea.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Carter, 40 Ala. 607 (Ala. 1867).

40 Ala. 607 (Ferguson v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharpe v. Booker
83 So. 2d 313 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Spear & Thomasson v. Lomax
42 Ala. 576 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)