Ferguson v. Avelo Mortgage, LLC

566 U.S. 973, 132 S. Ct. 2120, 182 L. Ed. 2d 866, 80 U.S.L.W. 3612, 2012 WL 1468533, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3339
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 30, 2012·No. No. 11-8648; No. 11-9003; No. 11-9023; No. 11-9056·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

App. Div., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles;

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 5th Dist.;

App. Div., Sup. Ct. Ñ. Y., 2d Jud. Dept.; and

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until May 21, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Avelo Mortgage, LLC, 566 U.S. 973, 132 S. Ct. 2120, 182 L. Ed. 2d 866, 80 U.S.L.W. 3612, 2012 WL 1468533, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 3339 (2012).

566 U.S. 973 (Ferguson v. Avelo Mortgage, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harry Parkin v. United States
565 F. App'x 149 (Third Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Willie Tyler
732 F.3d 241 (Third Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Richard Scruggs
714 F.3d 258 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
George Ryan v. United States
688 F.3d 845 (Seventh Circuit, 2012)
Petaluma FX Partners, LLC v. Comm'r
2012 T.C. Memo. 142 (U.S. Tax Court, 2012)