Ferguson v. Arnow

New York Supreme Court

Ferguson v. Arnow

21 N.Y.S. 308, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 852

DecidedDecember 12, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 308 (Ferguson v. Arnow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. Arnow, 21 N.Y.S. 308, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 852 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinions

PRATT, J.

We find no errors in this case prejudicial to the defendants. The verdict cannot be considered excessive. If it be that the court should have taken from the jury the questions of motive and want of probable cause, the defendants have not been thereby injured, for, had the court itself passed upon those questions, the result would have been the same, as we think the jury decided them correctly. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

DYKMAN, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

We find no errors in this case prejudicial to the defendants. The verdict cannot be considered excessive. If it be that the court should have taken from the jury the questions of motive and want of probable cause, the defendants have not been thereby injured, for, had the court itself passed upon those questions, the result would have been the same, as we think the jury decided them correctly. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

DYKMAN, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.Y.S. 308, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-arnow-nysupct-1892.