Ferguson v. Amerifirst Federal Savings & Loan Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ferguson v. Amerifirst Federal Savings & Loan Corp.

477 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16304

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1186

StatusPublished

This text of 477 So. 2d 27 (Ferguson v. Amerifirst Federal Savings & Loan Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferguson v. Amerifirst Federal Savings & Loan Corp., 477 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16304 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in striking appellants’ timely demand for jury trial. Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 321 So.2d 65 (Fla.1975); Merle v. Florida State Constructors, Inc., 472 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Magram v. Raffel, 443 So.2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.430(b); cf. Southeast Aluminum Supply Corp. v. Plastics North American, Inc., 413 So.2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (trial court specifically conditioned amendment on understanding that trial not be delayed).

We reverse the final judgment and remand with directions to reinstate appellants’ jury demand.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in striking appellants’ timely demand for jury trial. Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 321 So.2d 65 (Fla.1975); Merle v. Florida State Constructors, Inc., 472 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Magram v. Raffel, 443 So.2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.430(b); cf. Southeast Aluminum Supply Corp. v. Plastics North American, Inc., 413 So.2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (trial court specifically conditioned amendment on understanding that trial not be delayed).

We reverse the final judgment and remand with directions to reinstate appellants’ jury demand.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-amerifirst-federal-savings-loan-corp-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack