Ferer v. Garasimowicz

Fourth Circuit

Ferer v. Garasimowicz

569 F. App'x 149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2336

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 569 F. App'x 149 (Ferer v. Garasimowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferer v. Garasimowicz, 569 F. App'x 149 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Maria Isabel Ferer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ferrer v. Garasimowicz, No. 1:13-cv-00797-LMB-IDD, 2013 WL 5428110 (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Maria Isabel Ferer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ferrer v. Garasimowicz, No. 1:13-cv-00797-LMB-IDD, 2013 WL 5428110 (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 F. App'x 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferer-v-garasimowicz-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack