Ference v. Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ference v. Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park, Inc.

1 So. 3d 415, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 2009 WL 350610

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 2009

Docket2D08-370

StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 415 (Ference v. Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ference v. Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park, Inc., 1 So. 3d 415, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 2009 WL 350610 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park filed an action for declaratory relief against Sandra Ference and Ronald Riggle, the parents of Ryan Wesley Riggle, and Paul Ference, Ryan’s stepfather. Sylvan Abbey filed the action after Ronald Riggle objected to the Ferences’ request that Sylvan Abbey disinter Ryan’s body so they could inter it elsewhere. We find no error in the trial court’s declaration of Sylvan Abbey’s rights and obligations under chapter 497, Florida Statutes, and accordingly, we affirm. We further observe that Sylvan Abbey’s action did not address any claimed right of either parent to authorize the disinterment of their adult son; accordingly, the final judgment would not preclude the parties from litigating their respective rights in that regard.

Affirmed.

FULMER, CASANUEVA, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park filed an action for declaratory relief against Sandra Ference and Ronald Riggle, the parents of Ryan Wesley Riggle, and Paul Ference, Ryan’s stepfather. Sylvan Abbey filed the action after Ronald Riggle objected to the Ferences’ request that Sylvan Abbey disinter Ryan’s body so they could inter it elsewhere. We find no error in the trial court’s declaration of Sylvan Abbey’s rights and obligations under chapter 497, Florida Statutes, and accordingly, we affirm. We further observe that Sylvan Abbey’s action did not address any claimed right of either parent to authorize the disinterment of their adult son; accordingly, the final judgment would not preclude the parties from litigating their respective rights in that regard.

Affirmed.

FULMER, CASANUEVA, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 415, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 2009 WL 350610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ference-v-sylvan-abbey-memorial-park-inc-fladistctapp-2009.