Ferenc v. State
455 So. 2d 432, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14202
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1984·No. Nos. AU-43, AU-452 and AV-69·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s appeals from the denial of his motion for return of property and from his convictions of carrying a concealed firearm, possession of burglary tools, and attempted burglary while armed are affirmed. The state’s appeal from the order which partially granted appellant’s pretrial motion to suppress is therefore moot and we do not address the constitutionality of the arresting officer’s initial intrusion into the defendant’s van.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferenc v. State, 455 So. 2d 432, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
455 So. 2d 432 (Ferenc v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferenc v. State
563 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)