Fereday v. Mankedick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fereday v. Mankedick

34 A. 46, 172 Pa. 535, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 807

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 6, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 208

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 34 A. 46 (Fereday v. Mankedick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fereday v. Mankedick, 34 A. 46, 172 Pa. 535, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 807 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A careful examination of the record, including the able and exhaustive report of the learned master, has convinced us that his findings of fact as well as his conclusions of law are substantially correct, and fully justified the decree from which this appeal was taken. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires special'notice. Neither of them is sustained.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

A careful examination of the record, including the able and exhaustive report of the learned master, has convinced us that his findings of fact as well as his conclusions of law are substantially correct, and fully justified the decree from which this appeal was taken. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires special'notice. Neither of them is sustained.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A. 46, 172 Pa. 535, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fereday-v-mankedick-pa-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack