Home/New York Supreme Court/Ferebee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Ferebee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

82 Misc. 2d 874, 372 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2830
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 82 Misc. 2d 874 (Ferebee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferebee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance, 82 Misc. 2d 874, 372 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2830 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1975).

Opinion

Mario Pittoni, J.

Motion by respondent State Farm Mutual Insurance Company for an order staying arbitration is denied.

Acceptance of benefits under the no-fault provisions of the liability insurance policy does not preclude petitioner from pursuing her claim under the uninsured motorist provision of the policy of liability insurance issued her by respondent State Farm Insurance Company. Nothing in the statutory law au[875]*875thorizes or prohibits the bringing of both types of action. If respondent intended to preclude petitioner from the possibility of this dual recovery, respondent should have modified or amended its contract with petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Williams
263 N.W.2d 311 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1977)
Moses v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
89 Misc. 2d 106 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Misc. 2d 874, 372 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferebee-v-state-farm-mutual-insurance-nysupct-1975.