Ferdinand v. State
309 S.W.3d 811, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 141, 2010 WL 431300
This text of 309 S.W.3d 811 (Ferdinand v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ferdinand v. State, 309 S.W.3d 811, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 141, 2010 WL 431300 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Rickey E. Ferdinand appeals the order denying the motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding. Mr. Ferdinand challenges the motion court’s ruling that the post-conviction relief counsel’s untimely filing of the amended motion did not prejudice him.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wilson v. State
309 S.W.3d 811 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
309 S.W.3d 811, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 141, 2010 WL 431300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferdinand-v-state-moctapp-2010.