Ferber v. Treeline Garden City Plaza, LLC

16 A.D.3d 453, 791 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2551
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 453 (Ferber v. Treeline Garden City Plaza, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferber v. Treeline Garden City Plaza, LLC, 16 A.D.3d 453, 791 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated September 9, 2003, as granted the separate motions of the defendants Treeline Garden City Plaza, LLC, and Wonder Works Construction Corp., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendants Treeline Garden City Plaza, LLC, and Wonder Works Construction Corp.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when she tripped and fell on the edge of a raised masonite board located on the lobby floor of a building owned by the defendant Treeline Plaza, LLC (hereinafter Treeline). The masonite board was taped to the floor by the defendant Wonder Works Construction Corp. (hereinafter Wonder) to protect the floor during bathroom renovation work. The tape had allegedly become “raised and frayed.” Treeline and Wonder separately moved for summary judgment, and the Supreme Court granted the motions.

The plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether Treeline and Wonder had notice of the allegedly dangerous condition (see Ross v Lyndhurst, 290 AD2d 432, 434 [2002]). Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in granting the motions for [454]*454summary judgment. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bloomfield v. Jericho Union Free School District
80 A.D.3d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.3d 453, 791 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferber-v-treeline-garden-city-plaza-llc-nyappdiv-2005.