Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co.

822 So. 2d 502, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 512, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1098, 2002 WL 1030200
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 2002
DocketSC01-2528
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 822 So. 2d 502 (Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 822 So. 2d 502, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 512, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1098, 2002 WL 1030200 (Fla. 2002).

Opinion

822 So.2d 502 (2002)

Anthony J. FERAYORNI, etc., Petitioner,
v.
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Respondents.

No. SC01-2528.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 23, 2002.
Rehearing Denied July 15, 2002.

Thomas D. Lardin, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioner.

Francis M. McDonald, Jr., Orlando, FL, and Wendy F. Lumish, Miami, FL, of Carlton Fields, P.A.; and Leslie G. Landau of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ferayorni, 795 So.2d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with the Third District Court of Appeal's decision in Nash v. General Motors Corp., 734 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Subsequently, we approved, in part, the Third District's decision in Nash. See D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co., 806 So.2d 424, 442 (Fla.2001). On March 19, 2002, we entered an order directing the parties to show cause why the case should not be remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in D'Amario.

Upon review of the responses to the March 19, 2002, order, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case and remand the case to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in D'Amario. Accordingly, review is granted, the Fourth District's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded for reconsideration in accordance with our decision in D'Amario.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricks v. Loyola
822 So. 2d 502 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 So. 2d 502, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 512, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1098, 2002 WL 1030200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferayorni-v-hyundai-motor-co-fla-2002.