Feraca v. Werbalowsky

24 A.D.2d 726, 262 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3432

This text of 24 A.D.2d 726 (Feraca v. Werbalowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Feraca v. Werbalowsky, 24 A.D.2d 726, 262 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

The papers and proceedings before Special Term did not confer jurisdiction over the objector, a

necessary party, who had not been named as a party in the petition nor otherwise [727]*727joined thereafter. We reach no other question. Order reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 726, 262 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feraca-v-werbalowsky-nyappdiv-1965.