Feona Mason v. State
This text of Feona Mason v. State (Feona Mason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 22, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00173-CR ——————————— FEONA MASON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1282035
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Feona Antoinette Mason, pleaded guilty, without an agreed
recommendation from the State, to the felony offense of engaging in organized
criminal activity.1 On December 10, 2012, the trial court found Mason guilty and
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 71.02 (West Supp. 2013). sentenced her to nine years imprisonment. Mason filed a notice of appeal on the
same day. On January 9, 2013, Mason filed a motion for new trial, which the trial
court granted on February 25, 2013. Mason again pleaded guilty, without an agreed
recommendation, to the felony offense of engaging in organized criminal activity.
On February 26, 2013, the trial court entered an order that deferred adjudicating
Mason’s guilt and placed her on community supervision for six years. Mason did
not file a notice of appeal from the trial court’s February 26, 2013 order. We
dismiss the appeal.
The granting of a motion for new trial restores the case to its position before
the former trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b). Thus, Mason’s appeal of the
December 10, 2012 order was rendered moot by the trial court’s order granting a
new trial. We therefore lack subject-matter jurisdiction over this appeal and must
dismiss it. See Mosley v. State, No. 01-08-00503-CR, 01-08-00504-CR, 2009 WL
793808, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] March 26, 2009, no pet.).
To the extent that Mason seeks to appeal the trial court’s February 26, 2013
order, she did not timely file a notice of appeal from the order. In a criminal case,
an appellant must timely file a notice of appeal to perfect the appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(b); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
Mason’s December 10, 2012 notice of appeal was not effective as a prematurely
filed appeal of the trial court’s February 26, 2013 order because it was filed before
2 the trial court found sufficient evidence to find her guilty, deferred adjudication of
her guilt, and placed her on community supervision in the new trial. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 27.1(b) (“In a criminal case, a prematurely filed notice of appeal is
effective and deemed filed on the same day, but after, sentence is imposed or
suspended in open court, or the appealable order is signed by the trial court. But a
notice of appeal is not effective if filed before the trial court makes a finding of
guilt or receives a jury verdict.”). Because Mason did not timely file a new notice
of appeal from the trial court’s February 26, 2013 order, we can take no action
other than to dismiss the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1998).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Feona Mason v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feona-mason-v-state-texapp-2014.