Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co.

246 A.D. 678

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order modified and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum. We find the third alleged cause of action defective and the first, second, fourth, fifth and sixth alleged causes redundant and repetitious when the seventh alleged cause of action is considered. All concur. (The order dismisses six causes of action alleged in the complaint, in an action to recover damages resulting from contracting silicosis.) Present -— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum. We find the third alleged cause of action defective and the first, second, fourth, fifth and sixth alleged causes redundant and repetitious when the seventh alleged cause of action is considered. All concur. (The order dismisses six causes of action alleged in the complaint, in an action to recover damages resulting from contracting silicosis.) Present -— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co., 246 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 678 (Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related