Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co.

246 A.D. 678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D. 678 (Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Feola v. National Brass Manufacturing Co., 246 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum. We find the third alleged cause of action defective and the first, second, fourth, fifth and sixth alleged causes redundant and repetitious when the seventh alleged cause of action is considered. All concur. (The order dismisses six causes of action alleged in the complaint, in an action to recover damages resulting from contracting silicosis.) Present -— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum. We find the third alleged cause of action defective and the first, second, fourth, fifth and sixth alleged causes redundant and repetitious when the seventh alleged cause of action is considered. All concur. (The order dismisses six causes of action alleged in the complaint, in an action to recover damages resulting from contracting silicosis.) Present -— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feola-v-national-brass-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack