Fenzl v. Gerhardt

892 S.W.2d 767, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 14, 1995 WL 6760
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 10, 1995·No. No. 63774·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this court-tried case, defendants appeal from judgments in favor of plaintiff in consolidated suits on a promissory note and for damages for fraud and misrepresentation.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenzl v. Gerhardt, 892 S.W.2d 767, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 14, 1995 WL 6760 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

892 S.W.2d 767 (Fenzl v. Gerhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.