Fenyang Stewart v. UNC System

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 2018
Docket17-1813
StatusUnpublished

This text of Fenyang Stewart v. UNC System (Fenyang Stewart v. UNC System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fenyang Stewart v. UNC System, (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1813

FENYANG AJAMU STEWART,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SYSTEM; NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL & TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE ASSOCIATES, INC.; WILLIAM EDMONSON, NIA Distinguished Langley Professor, Full Professor, North Carolina A&T State University; JOHN KELLY, Chairman; ELECTRIC AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY; CATHY HOPKINS, Human Resources Director, National Institute of Aerospace,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01487-AJT-JFA)

Submitted: May 31, 2018 Decided: June 11, 2018

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fenyang Ajamu Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Eve Grandis Campbell, Laura K. Musick, O’HAGAN MEYER PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Fenyang Ajamu Stewart appeals the district court’s order dismissing the remainder

of his amended complaint for failure to state a claim. See Stewart v. Univ. of N.C. Sys.,

673 F. App’x 269, 270-72 (4th Cir. 2016) (No. 16-1552). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stewart’s motion to strike and affirm

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Univ. of N.C. Sys., No.

1:15-cv-01487-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. June 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. University of North Carolina System
673 F. App'x 269 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fenyang Stewart v. UNC System, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fenyang-stewart-v-unc-system-ca4-2018.