Fenton v. State

216 S.W.3d 260, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 424, 2007 WL 756108
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fenton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 935
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 2007·No. No. WD 66554·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Troy Fenton appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Fenton was found guilty after a jury trial of one count of escape from confinement, Section 575.210. Fenton alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to object to a State’s question during voir dire. This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and finds no error of law. A written opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenton v. State, 216 S.W.3d 260, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 424, 2007 WL 756108 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

216 S.W.3d 260 (Fenton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.