Fenton v. Fenton
This text of 8 Blackf. 446 (Fenton v. Fenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
EXECUTED a conveyance of real estate to his son B. ; the grantor, who was old and in his dotage, supposing he was executing only a title-bond for the land. A.’s intention was to secure, by such bond, the land against certain damages which he erroneously supposed C. would claim from him. This execution of a conveyance, instead of a title-bond, by A. was procured by deceit on the part of the grantee, who caused the deed to be recorded immediately after its execution.
On a bill in chancery against the grantee, filed by the other heirs of the grantor, the conveyance was set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Blackf. 446, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fenton-v-fenton-ind-1847.