Fennig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided August 5, 2020·No. 17-2019·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-2019V UNPUBLISHED

RANDALL FENNIG, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: July 1, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain- Barre Syndrome (GBS) Respondent.

Renee Ja Gentry, The Law Office of Renee J. Gentry, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On December 22, 2017, Randall Fennig filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of the influenza vaccine he received on October 17, 2016. Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 18, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. On June 23, 2020, Respondent filed an amended proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) (ECF No. 80-1) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a lump sum payment of $20,000.08 (consisting of $7,045.00 for partial pain and suffering, and $12,955.08 for past unreimbursable expenses) as well as an amount sufficient to purchase two annuity contracts pursuant to the terms set forth in the Proffer. Proffer at

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). 2-5. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award the following compensation:

1. A lump sum payment of $20,000.08, (consisting of $7,045.00 for partial pain and suffering and $12,955.08 for past unreimbursable expenses), in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, Randall Fennig;

2. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract subject to the conditions described in the Proffer to provide payments to Petitioner of $3,467.81 per year, for life only, compounding annually at 4.0%, beginning six (6) months from the date of judgment, paid to the Life Insurance Company from which the annuity will be purchased. These payments shall be provided through Respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to Petitioner, Randall Fennig, only so long as he is alive at the time a particular payment is due. Written notice shall be provided to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Life Insurance Company within twenty (20) days of Randall Fennig’s death; and

3. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in the Proffer to provide payments to Petitioner of $20,000.00 one (1) year from date of judgment; $50,000.00 two (2) years from date of judgment; $50,000.00 three (3) years from date of judgment; $50,000.00 four (4) years from the date of judgment; and, $45,555.00 five years (5) years from date of judgment, paid to the Life Insurance Company from which the annuity will be purchased. These payments shall be provided through Respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to Petitioner, Randall Fennig, at the time a particular payment is due.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Further, pursuant to Sections 15(g)3 and (h)4, the amounts

3 Section 15(g) specifically states:

Payment of compensation under the Program shall not be made for any item or service to the extent that payment has been made, or can reasonably be expected to be made, with respect to such item or service (1) under any State compensation program, under an insurance policy, or under any Federal or State health benefits program (other than under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.)), or (2) by an entity which provides health services on a prepaid basis. 4 Section 15(h) prohibits any health insurance policy from “mak[ing] payment of benefits under the policy secondary to the payment of compensation under the Program.”

2 awarded herein cannot be used to reimburse any insurer for its payments for Petitioner’s treatment in connection with the injury, sickness, accident, or condition which gave rise to this case.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) RANDALL FENNIG, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 17-2019V (ECF) v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

RESPONDENT'S AMENDED PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On October 17, 2018, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed

his Rule 4(c) Report conceding entitlement to compensation in this matter alleging the Table

injury Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) following an influenza vaccination. On October 18,

2018, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding Randall Fennig (“petitioner”) entitled to

compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1

to -34, as amended (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”). Respondent now proffers that petitioner receive a

compensation award consisting of the following, which represents compensation for all elements

of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled: 1

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNLCP, to provide

an estimation of petitioner’s future needs arising from his GBS. Respondent proffers that

petitioner should be awarded future medical expenses in accordance with Nurse Curtis’s life care

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fennig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Fennig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Fennig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a