Fennick v. Damon Sams

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: April 24, 2012
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2012-0642
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E

FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA APR 24 2072 C/ KEVIN FENNICK, ) ouarrt:',o-r~$;. D/str/¢;; & 3 ) he D/str/ U,agg/"/Dtcy Plaintiff, ) '5"@ ) v. ) Civil Action No. 0 ) 642 DAMON SAMS, el al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff alleges that he created a company called Dfs Entertainment in 1993, and that this company was to "promot[e] acting and all other aspects of the entertainment industry." Compl. 11 l. lt appears that the registration of the company name expired, at which time defendant "Sams licensed the company name" as "an act of revenge" for plaintiffs lawsuit against John Staco. Id. 11 5. Plaintiff brings "civil conspiracy charges against Damon Sams and the company," and he demands damages of $25 million. Id. 1l 6.

The elements of civil conspiracy are "(l) an agreement between two or more persons; (2) to participate in an unlawful act, or a lawful act in an unlawful manner; (3) an injury caused by an unlawful overt act performed by one of the parties to the agreement; (4) which overt act was done pursuant to and in furtherance of the common scheme." Halberstam v. Welch, 705 F.Zd 472, 477 (D.C. Cir. 1983). Absent from plaintiffs pleading are any factual allegations relating

to any of the elements of a conspiracy claim. As drafted, the complaint fails to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted, and, therefore, the complaint will be dismissed An Order

U gary )§@_ w

nited States District Judge

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE; /i'// ”25/‘;`