Fenner v. Simon

60 N.E. 363, 26 Ind. App. 628, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 317
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 1901·No. No. 3,765·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Black, J.

The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new tidal is alone assigned as error. In the motion for a new trial causes were stated as follows: “(1) The judgment of the court is contrary to the evidence; (2) the judgment of the court is not sustained by the evidence in this cause; (3) the judgment of the court is contrary to law.” The statute prescribing the cases in which a new trial may be granted in a civil action does not recognize as a cause fox a new trial any of the reasons stated in this motion. §568 Burns 1894, §559 Homer 1891.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenner v. Simon, 60 N.E. 363, 26 Ind. App. 628, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 317 (Ind. Ct. App. 1901).

60 N.E. 363 (Fenner v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Quarries Co. v. Lay
73 N.E. 608 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)