Fenner v. Simon
This text of 60 N.E. 363 (Fenner v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new tidal is alone assigned as error. In the motion for a new trial causes were stated as follows: “(1) The judgment of the court is contrary to the evidence; (2) the judgment of the court is not sustained by the evidence in this cause; (3) the judgment of the court is contrary to law.” The statute prescribing the cases in which a new trial may be granted in a civil action does not recognize as a cause fox a new trial any of the reasons stated in this motion. §568 Burns 1894, §559 Homer 1891.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 N.E. 363, 26 Ind. App. 628, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fenner-v-simon-indctapp-1901.