Fenner v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fenner v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.

864 S.W.2d 955, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1786

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1993·No. No. 62915·Published

Opinion

[956]*956 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

These appeals arise out of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award in a worker’s compensation claim. Both the claimant, James Fenner, and the employer, Pulitzer Publishing Company, appeal from the Commission’s award. These appeals were consolidated into this action. We affirm the Commission’s award.

An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[956]*956 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

These appeals arise out of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award in a worker’s compensation claim. Both the claimant, James Fenner, and the employer, Pulitzer Publishing Company, appeal from the Commission’s award. These appeals were consolidated into this action. We affirm the Commission’s award.

An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b).

Fenner v. Pulitzer Publishing Co., 864 S.W.2d 955, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1786 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

864 S.W.2d 955 (Fenner v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.