Fenner v. Luzerne County

31 A. 862, 167 Pa. 632, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 961
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 29, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 459·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question presented by the case stated is whether the act of April 2,1868, P. L. 3, was repealed by the act of May 23, 1893, P. L. 117, so far as relates to the fees of aldermen, justices of the peace and constables elected or appointed in Luzerne county, subsequent to the passage of the last mentioned act. The learned judge of the court below held that it was, and he accordingly entered judgment against the defendant for fees under said act of 1893.

For reasons given in his opinion we are satisfied there was no error in so doing, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenner v. Luzerne County, 31 A. 862, 167 Pa. 632, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 961 (Pa. 1895).

31 A. 862 (Fenner v. Luzerne County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West Norman Timber, Inc. v. State
224 P.2d 635 (Washington Supreme Court, 1950)
Continental Oil Co. v. City of Santa Fe
177 P. 742 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1918)
Dallas County v. Lively
167 S.W. 219 (Texas Supreme Court, 1914)
Western Lumber & Pole Co. v. City of Golden
23 Colo. App. 461 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1913)
Edwards v. McLean
23 Pa. Super. 43 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
McCallister v. Armstrong County
9 Pa. Super. 423 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Hays v. Cumberland County
5 Pa. Super. 159 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Commonwealth ex rel. Cambria County v. Lloyd
2 Pa. Super. 6 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
McAdam v. Rainey
33 La. Ann. 108 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1881)