Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment

Fourth Circuit

Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment

535 F. App'x 314

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2013·No. No. 13-1437·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER. CURIAM:

Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Fenner’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. City of Curham/Board of Adjustment, No. 1:10-cv-383-TDS-JLW, 2013 WL 1182240 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER. CURIAM:

Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Fenner’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. City of Curham/Board of Adjustment, No. 1:10-cv-383-TDS-JLW, 2013 WL 1182240 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment, 535 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

535 F. App'x 314 (Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related