Fenner v. Bell

Fourth Circuit

Fenner v. Bell

375 F. App'x 362

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2010·No. No. 09-2348·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. Bell, No. l:08-cv-00367-TDS-DPD, 2009 WL 6372547 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. Bell, No. l:08-cv-00367-TDS-DPD, 2009 WL 6372547 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIMED.

Fenner v. Bell, 375 F. App'x 362 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

375 F. App'x 362 (Fenner v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.