Fenner v. Abrams, Fenner & Gravitz, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fenner v. Abrams, Fenner & Gravitz, Inc.

55 A.D.2d 926, 390 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10178

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 926 (Fenner v. Abrams, Fenner & Gravitz, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fenner v. Abrams, Fenner & Gravitz, Inc., 55 A.D.2d 926, 390 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10178 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a declaratory judgment action to determine the rights of the parties under certain agreements and to declare null and void a certain stockholders meeting, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, limited their stock ownership in the defendant corporation to 40%. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Plaintiffs, owners of 50% of the issued and outstanding stock of defendant corporation, entered into an agreement, dated July 1, 1972, under which they and defendants Morton A. Abrams and Nathan S. Abrams were to transfer a percentage of their stock to the other individual defendants, Marvin Rosen and Jerome Abrams. Plaintiffs contend that the said agreement was ambiguous and that Special Term erred in refusing to admit parol evidence in explanation thereof. We find, however, that there was no ambiguity in the agreement. By its terms it is clear that each plaintiff was required to transfer a sufficient number of shares of his stock pursuant to the agreement so that, collectively, the plaintiffs would retain a total of only 40% of the stock of the defendant corporation. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a declaratory judgment action to determine the rights of the parties under certain agreements and to declare null and void a certain stockholders meeting, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 1976, as, after a nonjury trial, limited their stock ownership in the defendant corporation to 40%. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Plaintiffs, owners of 50% of the issued and outstanding stock of defendant corporation, entered into an agreement, dated July 1, 1972, under which they and defendants Morton A. Abrams and Nathan S. Abrams were to transfer a percentage of their stock to the other individual defendants, Marvin Rosen and Jerome Abrams. Plaintiffs contend that the said agreement was ambiguous and that Special Term erred in refusing to admit parol evidence in explanation thereof. We find, however, that there was no ambiguity in the agreement. By its terms it is clear that each plaintiff was required to transfer a sufficient number of shares of his stock pursuant to the agreement so that, collectively, the plaintiffs would retain a total of only 40% of the stock of the defendant corporation. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 926, 390 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fenner-v-abrams-fenner-gravitz-inc-nyappdiv-1977.