Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp.

369 F. App'x 132
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 2010
DocketNo. 2009-1496
StatusPublished

This text of 369 F. App'x 132 (Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., 369 F. App'x 132 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case is aj(firmed. We uphold the district court’s grant of summary judgment of no infringement based on the court’s determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that no reasonable jury could find that the accused devices of Microsoft and Nintendo meet the pulse width limitation of the asserted claims of Fenner’s U.S. Patent No. 6,297,751 literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. We need not and do not address Microsoft’s alternate ground for affirmance, nor do we address the question raised by Fenner whether the district court erred in its construction of the claim term “processor.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 F. App'x 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fenner-investments-ltd-v-microsoft-corp-cafc-2010.