Fennen v. State

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 32
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedMarch 15, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 32 (Fennen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fennen v. State, 1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 32 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Yerona Persel spoke some dialect of the Polish language which the official interpreter could not understand and translate. Mary Batsclie was called and examined by the court as to her qualifications, which the court approved, and thereupon she was sworn to act as interpreter. It is complained that' she was not sworn on her voir dire, that is, before answering the court’s interrogations as to her qualifications.

The passing upon the -qualifications of an interpreter is peculiarly within the sound discretion of the court, and this being so, it is for the court to determine as to the character of testimony, sworn or unsworn, which will satisfy that discretion, and the court’s approval is conclusive in the absence- of a charge of abuse of discretion.

The evidence sufficiently sustains the verdict of guilty on the charge of. robbery.

Judgment -affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fennen-v-state-ohiocirct-1903.