Fennen v. State
This text of 14 Ohio C.C. Dec. 583 (Fennen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Verona Percel spoke some dialect of the Polish language which the official interpreter could not understand and' translate. Mary Batsche was called and examined by the court as to her qualifications, which the court approved, and thereupon she was sworn to act as interpreter.
It is complained that she was not sworn on her voir dire, that is before answering the court’s interrogations as to her qualifications.
The passing upon the qualifications of an interpreter is peculiarly [584]*584within the sound discretion of the court, and this being so, it is for the court to determine as to the character of testimony, sworn or unsworn, which will satisfy that discretion, and the court’s approval is conclusive •in the absence of a charge of abuse of discretion.
The evidence sufficiently sustains the verdict of guilty on the charge of robbery.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Ohio C.C. Dec. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fennen-v-state-ohcircthamilton-1903.