Fennan v. City of Atlantic
101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 674, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 391
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor,' Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fennan v. City of Atlantic, 101 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 674, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 391 (N.J. 1917).
101 A. 1054 (Fennan v. City of Atlantic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hertz Washmobile System v. South Orange
124 A.2d 68 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)