Fenn v. Blanchard

2 Yeates 543
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the court.

This verdict is substantially good, though inarti ficially worded by the jury. It only finds for the plaintiff, if the deed of settlement was legal and good. Judging on the words of it, we can have no difficulty about it; and if we could be allowed to travel out of the words of it, we had no doubts at the trial, that it was executed when General Stewart had a clear estate, and that it was good as to his subsequent creditors. But in this stage of the cause, the laiv forbids all such inquires, and we are confined to the facts found.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenn v. Blanchard, 2 Yeates 543 (Pa. 1800).

2 Yeates 543 (Fenn v. Blanchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holbrook v. Colburn
27 S.C. Eq. 289 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1854)
Wallingford v. Dunlap
14 Pa. 31 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1850)
Edgar v. Kline
6 Pa. 327 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1847)