Fenimore Circle Corp. v. State Liquor Authority

262 N.E.2d 415, 27 N.Y.2d 716, 314 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1190
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1970·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The State Liquor Authority Hearing Officer should have permitted petitioner’s counsel to examine the statements made by Trooper Smith, when that witness took the stand, for purposes of cross-examination, there being no indication that they contained matter that must be kept confidential or that their disclosure would be inimical to the public interest. In view of the proof adduced, however, the error committed must be deemed harmless.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenimore Circle Corp. v. State Liquor Authority, 262 N.E.2d 415, 27 N.Y.2d 716, 314 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1190 (N.Y. 1970).

262 N.E.2d 415 (Fenimore Circle Corp. v. State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Ontario County Health Facility
103 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Gleason v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
98 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Waddell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
97 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)