Fenerson v. State

882 S.W.2d 236, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1005, 1994 WL 270470
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1994·No. No. 64896·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fenerson v. State, 882 S.W.2d 236, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1005, 1994 WL 270470 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

882 S.W.2d 236 (Fenerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.