Fenelon v. McNeil
22 So. 3d 617, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13918, 2009 WL 2960376
Opinion
DISMISSED. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(b) (providing that court may not extend the time for making a motion for rehearing); Surratt v. Freeman, 924 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (distinguishing Newell v. Moore, 826 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)); Ashley v. Moore, 742 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (rejecting argument for additional time to serve motion for rehearing when underlying order is served by mail).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fenelon v. McNeil, 22 So. 3d 617, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13918, 2009 WL 2960376 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
22 So. 3d 617 (Fenelon v. McNeil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newell v. Moore
826 So. 2d 1033 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Ashley v. Moore
742 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Surratt v. Freeman
924 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)