Fender v. Shaw
This text of 69 S.E. 110 (Fender v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no abuse of discretion in granting an interlocutory' injunction, to continue of force until the final trial of the cause.
(a) The demurrers were not passed upon as such, but considered as part of the cause shown by the defendant against the grant of the interlocutory injunction.
2. The order granting the injunction is so worded as to be susceptible of the construction that other relief, final in character, was also granted [225]*225on the interlocutory hearing. It reads, that “the restraining order is made continuous and the prayers of plaintiff .is [are] hereby granted.” Direction is given to so modify it as to eliminate • this ambiguity and leave the grant of the interlocutory injunction to stand'.
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 S.E. 110, 135 Ga. 224, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fender-v-shaw-ga-1910.