Fender v. Shaw

69 S.E. 110, 135 Ga. 224, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 489
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 11, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 110 (Fender v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fender v. Shaw, 69 S.E. 110, 135 Ga. 224, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 489 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in granting an interlocutory' injunction, to continue of force until the final trial of the cause.

(a) The demurrers were not passed upon as such, but considered as part of the cause shown by the defendant against the grant of the interlocutory injunction.

2. The order granting the injunction is so worded as to be susceptible of the construction that other relief, final in character, was also granted [225]*225on the interlocutory hearing. It reads, that “the restraining order is made continuous and the prayers of plaintiff .is [are] hereby granted.” Direction is given to so modify it as to eliminate • this ambiguity and leave the grant of the interlocutory injunction to stand'.

October 11, 1910. Injunction. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court. May 16, 1910. E. K. Wilcox, for plaintiffs in error. Hendricks & Christian, contra.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Flint River Pecan Co.
126 S.E. 769 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Fender v. Shaw
89 S.E. 518 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 110, 135 Ga. 224, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fender-v-shaw-ga-1910.