Fendall v. Turner
This text of 8 F. Cas. 1136 (Fendall v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
decided: 1. That the motion might be sustained in the name of Fen-dall, although he had taken the insolvent oath. 2. That the sergeant could not levy the execution of Deneale v. Fendall on the money in his own hands made on the fi. fa. of Fendall v. Towers, and that such return was not good.
Judgment for the amount made on the fi. fa., and fifteen per cent per annum damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F. Cas. 1136, 1 Cranch 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fendall-v-turner-circtddc-1801.