FENCHER v. State

37 So. 3d 938, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8208, 2010 WL 2305474
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 10, 2010
Docket1D09-2441
StatusPublished

This text of 37 So. 3d 938 (FENCHER v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FENCHER v. State, 37 So. 3d 938, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8208, 2010 WL 2305474 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 318 (Fla.2007) (“Under our cases, the preservation of a challenge to a potential juror requires more than one objection. When a trial court denies or grants a peremptory challenge, the objecting party must renew and reserve the objection before the jury is sworn.”).

KAHN, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carratelli v. State
961 So. 2d 312 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 So. 3d 938, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8208, 2010 WL 2305474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fencher-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.