Femia v. City of Bayonne
170 A. 56, 112 N.J.L. 89, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 228
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Hehee. Perskie, Yan Buskirk. Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Femia v. City of Bayonne, 170 A. 56, 112 N.J.L. 89, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 228 (N.J. 1934).
170 A. 56 (Femia v. City of Bayonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McChesney v. Moore
78 A.2d 389 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1951)