Felty v. State, Department of Environment Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Felty v. State, Department of Environment Regulation

601 So. 2d 310, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624, 1992 WL 138802

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 24, 1992

DocketNo. 92-0047

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 310 (Felty v. State, Department of Environment Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Felty v. State, Department of Environment Regulation, 601 So. 2d 310, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624, 1992 WL 138802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in compelling them to make payments into the registry of the court. The appellees have cited no legal authority for the proposition that, in addition to the ordinary remedies of a creditor, they are [311]*311entitled to a court order compelling payments from a debtor. We reverse and remand on the authority of Law v. NCNB National Bank of Florida, 452 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), and distinguish between the order here compelling the deposit of mortgage payments, and an order compelling the deposit of rents, pursuant to a mortgage provision assigning such rents to the mortgagee. In the latter case, Section 697.07, Fla.Stat. (1989) authorizes a trial court to compel such a deposit into the registry of the court upon proper application by the mortgagee. See Williams v. First Union Nat. Bank, 591 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in compelling them to make payments into the registry of the court. The appellees have cited no legal authority for the proposition that, in addition to the ordinary remedies of a creditor, they are [311]*311entitled to a court order compelling payments from a debtor. We reverse and remand on the authority of Law v. NCNB National Bank of Florida, 452 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), and distinguish between the order here compelling the deposit of mortgage payments, and an order compelling the deposit of rents, pursuant to a mortgage provision assigning such rents to the mortgagee. In the latter case, Section 697.07, Fla.Stat. (1989) authorizes a trial court to compel such a deposit into the registry of the court upon proper application by the mortgagee. See Williams v. First Union Nat. Bank, 591 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

601 So. 2d 310, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624, 1992 WL 138802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felty-v-state-department-of-environment-regulation-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack