Felty v. Calhoon
This text of 23 A. 438 (Felty v. Calhoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court below was right in dismissing appellant’s petition. It was alleged to be a petition of review, and the modesty of the petitioner evidently prevented him from saying that it was an application to review a decision of this court. This the learned judge below, for obvious reasons, declined to do. The appellant is very late with his allegation that the lot was to be two hundred and seventy feet front, instead of four hundred, — a difference so palpable that no one but an imbecile could fail to see it.
The order is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant. C.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A. 438, 147 Pa. 27, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felty-v-calhoon-pa-1892.