Felton v. . Weaver

1 N.C. 741
CourtCourt of King's Bench
DecidedJuly 5, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 741 (Felton v. . Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Felton v. . Weaver, 1 N.C. 741 (kingsbench 1793).

Opinion

But WHITLOCK, J., thought differently.

And by the advice of DODERIDGE, J., the party took such a certiorari exofficio, and the judgment was reversed.

Novel Entry, 254, 263, 267; Gage's case, 5 Rep., quod intratur, M. 39, 40 Eliz., and Bishop's case, 5 Rep., quod rotulat; P., 33 Eliz. rot., 361, which was after a nihil dicit, and not after an in nullo est erratum, as the book says. T., 13 Jac., rot., 52. Bishop of Rochester's case, andYoung's case. The entry here shall not be as the party requires, but as awarded by the court. Novel Entry, 242, 266; 1 Roll., 764, 765; Jones, 139; Noy, 83.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felton-v-weaver-kingsbench-1793.