Felt v. Salt Lake City

90 P. 402, 32 Utah 275, 1907 Utah LEXIS 42
Utah Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1907·No. No. 1801·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

STRAUP, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been caused by a change in the grade of a street and sidewalk in Salt Lake City. A judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

The facts involved in the transaction, and the questions presented on the appeal, are the same as were involved and presented in the cases of Kimball v. Salt Lake Gity, ante, p. 253, 90 Pac. '395, and Hempstead v. Balt Lake City, ante, p. 261, 90 Pac. 397. This case is therefore controlled by those cases.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed, with costs. Such is the order.

McCARTY, C. L, and FRICK, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felt v. Salt Lake City, 90 P. 402, 32 Utah 275, 1907 Utah LEXIS 42 (Utah 1907).

90 P. 402 (Felt v. Salt Lake City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Springville Banking Co. v. Burton
349 P.2d 157 (Utah Supreme Court, 1960)
Richards v. Salt Lake City
161 P. 680 (Utah Supreme Court, 1916)
Salt Lake & U. R. v. Butterfield
150 P. 931 (Utah Supreme Court, 1915)
Gray v. Salt Lake City
138 P. 1177 (Utah Supreme Court, 1914)
Coalter v. Salt Lake City
120 P. 851 (Utah Supreme Court, 1912)
Webber v. Salt Lake City
120 P. 503 (Utah Supreme Court, 1911)