Felt v. Boston & Maine Railroad
This text of 37 N.E. 375 (Felt v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence entirely fails to disclose how the accident happened, or what caused it. The plaintiff’s intestate said, when asked how it happened, that he did not know. The cause and manner of the accident are wholly matters of conjecture. There is nothing in the evidence tending to show any defect in the ways, works, or machinery of the defendant to which it might be inferred that the accident was due, nor any negligence on the part of the conductor or any one else in charge of or managing the train or engine.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 N.E. 375, 161 Mass. 311, 1894 Mass. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/felt-v-boston-maine-railroad-mass-1894.