Felso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Felso v. State

875 So. 2d 786, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8736, 2004 WL 1393758

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 2004·No. No. 3D01-3210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal. We affirm the trial court as to both. As to [787]*787the first issue, concerning the question of the claim of newly discovered evidence, our affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to file any motion that might be appropriate under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

In view of the fact that we find that appellant’s second point lacks merit, we do not further address it herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal. We affirm the trial court as to both. As to [787]*787the first issue, concerning the question of the claim of newly discovered evidence, our affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to file any motion that might be appropriate under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

In view of the fact that we find that appellant’s second point lacks merit, we do not further address it herein.

Felso v. State, 875 So. 2d 786, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8736, 2004 WL 1393758 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

875 So. 2d 786 (Felso v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.