Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F.4th 664
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 18, 2023·No. 22-15827·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 18 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN No. 22-15827 ATHLETES, an Oklahoma corporation; FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN D.C. No. 4:20-cv-02798-HSG ATHLETES OF PIONEER HIGH Northern District of California, SCHOOL, an unincorporated association; Oakland CHARLOTTE KLARKE; ELIZABETH SINCLAIR, ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION; NANCY ALBARRAN, in her official and personal capacity; HERB ESPIRITU, in his official and personal capacity; PETER GLASSER, in his official and personal capacity; STEPHEN MCMAHON, in his official and personal capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio, (9th Cir. 2023).

Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio (Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Educatio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.