Fellows v. Spaulding

6 N.E. 548, 141 Mass. 89, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 135
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

This is a bill in equity to restrain the several defendants from proving their claims against an insolvent debtor [93] in the Court of Insolvency. If, in any case, such a bill, in the nature of a bill of peace, can be maintained, where there are many creditors whose debts depend upon the same question, and who threaten, by separate appeals, to harass the assignee with a multiplicity of vexatious suits, which we need not decide, this bill does not state a case which calls for the interposition of a court of equity. Such a bill is addressed to the discretion of the court of equity, and will not be entertained unless it appears that there is a practical necessity for the interposition of the court to prevent vexatious litigation. The bill sets out, that numerous creditors have presented their several debts for proof in insolvency, which have not been passed upon by the judge of insolvency; and that they are all controlled and owned by one of the defendants. The same questions of law are raised in each case, and there is no reason why one suit, in the usual course of proceedings in insolvency, the other cases being continued to abide the result, should not settle all the cases. There is no allegation that the defendants threaten or intend to harass the plaintiffs by vexatious litigation, and practically the whole controversy can be conveniently settled in the forum to which it belongs. We see no reason for restraining the defendants by injunction from pursuing the remedy which the statutes provide for such cases.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fellows v. Spaulding, 6 N.E. 548, 141 Mass. 89, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 135 (Mass. 1886).

6 N.E. 548 (Fellows v. Spaulding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parkway, Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance
51 N.E.2d 436 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Rowley v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
68 F.2d 527 (Tenth Circuit, 1934)
Police Commissioner v. City of Boston
181 N.E. 790 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
City of Albany v. Spragins
108 So. 32 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
International Paper Co. v. Bellows Falls Canal Co.
90 A. 943 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1914)
Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Quigley
181 F. 190 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas, 1910)
Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Donahoe
8 Del. Ch. 422 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1899)
Van Auken v. Dammeier
40 P. 89 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1895)